Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:44
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Vienna calling: Strauss's 'Blue Danube' waltzes into outer space - Phys.org
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
The #1 Underrated Vegetable with More Vitamin C Than an Orange, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why do people say "tall, dark, and handsome" when they actually mean "tall, white, and handsome"?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
NBA Finals Game 2 Spread: The History Behind Big Thunder-Pacers Line - Action Network
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Which bands became massively popular for covering songs rather than recording originals?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.